This I forgot to state on the last post here, so here is the response to the Daily Telegraph (UK Newspaper) piece on the ”question of the Muslim problem” in contemporary Britain.
As stated above, I forgot to make an important observational point in response to the idiot (Messr. James Kirkup) who wrote The Telegraph article (see above) and made an ‘advisory point’ on how to make Muslims ‘more westernized’ and thus less religion-loving or proud (or practising); or ”radical” as popularly labelled; or as he puts it, corrupt them with wealth and ‘let their values … take care of themselves’ . He writes,
Worried about the rising number of Muslim children in our schools? Then you should hope they pass their exams, go to good universities and get well-paid jobs. Especially the girls. Really, turn more Muslims into fully paid-up members of the Waitrose-shopping, Audi-driving, Boden-wearing middle-classes and their values will take care of themselves.
Here is our feedback-response:
Of all those who went to fight or took up the cause and committed violent acts inside western borders how many were not ”members of the waitrose-shopping, Audi-driving, Boden-wearing middle classes” and (added Weds 18 Feb) how many of those who went to fight (or were ”radicalized”) were well-educated (up the kazoo) with bright future in medicine, doctoring, engineering, and so forth (answer: almost all of them were)? Finally, and how many of those were not ”Muslim Girls” – who Mr. Co*kup, oops, Kirkup, requested these be saved by over-education – among the educated (answer: almost all were).
In other words, this idiot, Messr. Kirup, should make an effort to have full knowledge of a subject before ”advising” or engaging with it. The point, in short, is it does not matter if Muslims are made more ”upper middle class-y” or more economically well-off, Muslims will always be moved by the suffering of fellow Muslims.
Finally, the answer to the above question, that many of those who took to the cause (with violence) they all came from these Audi-driving (many Audis as such), Waitrose-shopping, Boden-wearing middle and upper middle British Muslim classes, and it is not that the lower British Muslim classes are less able or ‘moved by the suffering of their fellow Muslims’ but for most …………… (will leave it here).
Oh, and in terms of an actual feasible advice:
STOP MEDDLING ON OTHER’S AFFAIRS and you will probably be irrelevant to idiots with violent attitudes; ask Scandinavian states and others. Of course, colonial mentality is ingrained within western foreign policy so there is no hope for such a divorce or a halt away from interference in other’s internal affairs, which means no end to idiots (old western colonial powers)-to-idiots (any resistant or independent-minded challengers to western interference) violent power-games.
Finally from the most-sophisticated propaganda paper in the US (plus Washington Post, see National Interest recent review and many others of course) ardently pro-Jewish, The New York Times, comes this article published today (Tues Feb 17) on it’s op-ed and written, surprise-surprise, by a vocal Jew who says it loud that today western wars are wars against Muslim and Islam and thus advice the west to ‘stop hiding from this truth’ through semantics of wars against ‘terror’ or ‘dark forces’ etc and admit such a fact openly (not just holding this ‘truth’ behind doors as principal tenent of their policies in the Muslim World).
Here is the article: Cohen: Islam and the West at War
- New Updates [Weds 25.02.2015]
- Palestinian Authority must pay $650m damages to families of Americans killed in terrorist attacks, rules New York court
- Police secretly spy on phones with cell-tower simulators
- Canadian Spies Collect Domestic Emails in Secret Security Sweep
- British politics isn’t so much rotten as past its use-by date | Rafael Behr | Comment is free | The Guardian
- Africa is new ‘El Dorado of espionage’, leaked files reveal