The article is an excellent case study of an expansion of modern day western totalitarianism. The article examines the rise of United States Totalitarianism, or a ‘Post-Constitutional America’ as the author (Peter Van Buren) defines it.
The article is highly recommended reading. What is written in the article is found also inside other so-called post-modern western states from ‘Liberal’ France to ‘Autocratic’ Britain, ‘confused’ Germany and so forth.
READ AND BE SHOCKED!!!!
Welcome to post-Constitution America
What if your country begins to change and nobody notices? As the weaponry and technology of war came home, so did a new, increasingly Guantanamo-ized definition of justice. This is one thing the Bradley Manning case has made clear.
On July 30, 1778, the Continental Congress created the first American whistleblower  protection law, stating “that it is the duty of all persons in the service of the United States to give the earliest information to Congress or other proper authority of any misconduct, frauds, or misdemeanors committed by any officers or persons in the service of these states.”
Two hundred thirty-five years later, on July 30, 2013, Bradley Manning was found guilty  on 20 of the 22 charges for which he was prosecuted, specifically for “espionage” and for videos of war atrocities  he released, but not for “aiding the enemy.”
Days after the verdict, with sentencing hearings in which Manning could receive 136 years of prison time ongoing, the pundits have had their say. The problem is that they missed the most chilling aspect of the Manning case: the way it ushered us, almost unnoticed, into post-Constitutional America.
The weapons of war come home
Even before the Manning trial began, the emerging look of that new America was coming into view. In recent years, weapons, tactics, and techniques developed in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as in the war on terror have begun arriving in “the homeland.”
Consider, for instance, the rise of the warrior cop , of increasingly up-armored police departments across the country often filled with former military personnel encouraged to use the sort of rough tactics they once wielded in combat zones. Supporting them are the kinds of weaponry that once would have been inconceivable in police departments, including armored vehicles, typically bought with Department of Homeland Security grants . Recently, the director of the FBI informed a Senate committee that the Bureau was deploying  its first drones over the United States. Meanwhile, Customs and Border Protection, part of the Department of Homeland Security and already flying an expanding fleet of Predator drones, the very ones used in America’s war zones, is eager to arm  them with “non-lethal” weaponry to “immobilize targets of interest.”
Above all, surveillance technology has been coming home from our distant war zones. The National Security Agency (NSA), for instance, pioneered the use of cell phones to track potential enemy movements in Iraq and Afghanistan. The NSA did this in one of several ways. With the aim of remotely turning on cell phones as audio monitoring or GPS devices, rogue signals could be sent out through an existing network, or NSA software could be implanted on phones disguised as downloads of porn or games.
Using fake cell phone towers that actually intercept phone signals en route to real towers, the US could harvest hardware information in Iraq and Afghanistan that would forever label a phone and allow the NSA to always uniquely identify it, even if the SIM card  was changed. The fake cell towers also allowed the NSA to gather precise location data for the phone, vacuum up metadata, and monitor what was being said.
At one point, more than 100 NSA teams had been scouring Iraq  for snippets of electronic data that might be useful to military planners. The agency’s director, General Keith Alexander, changed that: he devised a strategy called Real Time Regional Gateway  to grab every Iraqi text, phone call, email, and social media interaction. “Rather than look for a single needle in the haystack, his approach was, ‘Let’s collect the whole haystack,’” said  one former senior US intelligence official. “Collect it all, tag it, store it, and whatever it is you want, you go searching for it.”
Sound familiar, Mr. Snowden?
Welcome home, soldier (Part I)
Thanks to Edward Snowden , we now know that the “collect it all” technique employed by the NSA in Iraq would soon enough be used to collect American metadata and other electronically available information, including credit card transactions, air ticket purchases, and financial records. At the vast new $2 billion data center  it is building in Bluffdale, Utah, and at other locations, the NSA is following its Iraq script of saving everything, so that once an American became a target, his or her whole history can be combed through. Such searches do not require approval  by a court, or even an NSA supervisor. As it happened, however, the job was easier to accomplish in the US than in Iraq, as internet companies  and telephone service providers  are required by secret law to hand over the required data, neatly formatted, with no messy spying required.
When the US wanted something in Iraq or Afghanistan, they sent guys to kick down doors and take it. This, too, may be beginning to happen here at home. Recently, despite other valuable and easily portable objects lying nearby, computers , and only computers, were stolen from the law offices representing State Department whistleblower Aurelia Fedenisn. Similarly, a Washington law firm representing NSA whistleblower Tom Drake  had computers , and only computers, stolen from its office.
In these years, the FBI has brought two other NSA wartime tools home. The Bureau now uses a device called Stingray  to recreate those battlefield fake cell phone towers and track people in the US without their knowledge. Stingray offers some unique advantages: it bypasses the phone company entirely, which is, of course, handy in a war zone in which a phone company may be controlled by less than cooperative types, or if phone companies no longer cooperate with the government, or simply if you don’t want the phone company or anyone else to know you’re snooping. American phone companies seem to have been quite cooperative. Verizon , for instance, admits hacking its own cellular modems (“air cards ”) to facilitate FBI intrusion.
The FBI is also following NSA’s lead implanting spyware  and other hacker software developed for our war zones secretly and remotely in American computers and cell phones. The Bureau can then remotely turn on phone and laptop microphones, even webcams, to monitor citizens, while files can be pulled from a computer or implanted onto a computer.
Among the latest examples of war technology making the trip back to the homeland is the aerostat , a tethered medium-sized blimp. Anyone who served in Iraq or Afghanistan will recognize  the thing, as one or more of them flew over nearly every military base of any size or importance. The Army recently announced plans to operate two such blimps over Washington, D.C ., starting in 2014. Allegedly they are only to serve as anti-missile defenses, though in our war zones they were used as massive surveillance platforms. As a taste of the sorts of surveillance systems the aerostats were equipped with abroad but the Army says they won’t have here at home, consider Gorgon Stare , a system that can transmit live images of an entire town . And unlike drones, an aerostat never needs to land. Ever.
Welcome home, soldier (Part II)
And so to Bradley Manning.
As the weaponry and technology of war came home, so did a new, increasingly Guantanamo-ized definition of justice. This is one thing the Manning case has made clear.
As a start, Manning was treated no differently than America’s war-on-terror prisoners at Guantanamo and the black sites  that the Bush administration set up around the world. Picked up on the “battlefield,” Manning was first kept incommunicado  in a cage in Kuwait for two months with no access to a lawyer. Then, despite being an active duty member of the Army, he was handed over to the Marines, who also guard Guantanamo, to be held in a military prison in Quantico, Virginia. 
What followed were three years of cruel detainment , where, as might well have happened at Gitmo, Manning, kept in isolation, was deprived of clothing, communications, legal advice, and sleep. The sleep deprivation regime  imposed on him certainly met any standard, other than Washington’s and possibly Pyongyang’s, for torture. In return for such abuse, even after a judge had formally ruled that he was subjected to excessively harsh treatment, Manning will only get a 112-day reduction  in his eventual sentence.
Eventually the Obama administration decided Manning was to be tried as a soldier before a military court. In the courtroom, itself inside a military facility  that also houses NSA headquarters, there was a strikingly gulag-like atmosphere. His trial was built around secret witnesses and secret evidence; severe restrictions were put on the press – the Army denied  press passes to 270 of the 350 media organizations that applied; and there was a clear appearance of injustice . Among other things, the judge  ruled against nearly every defense motion.
During the months of the trial, the US military refused to release official transcripts of the proceedings. Even a private courtroom sketch artist was barred  from the room. Independent journalist and activist Alexa O’Brien  then took it upon herself to attend the trial daily, defy the Army, and make an unofficial  record  of the proceedings by hand. Later in the trial, armed military police were stationed behind reporter s listening to testimony. Above all, the feeling that Manning’s fate was predetermined could hardly be avoided. After all, President Obama, the former Constitutional law professor, essentially proclaimed him guilty  back in 2011 and the Department of Defense didn’t hesitate to state  more generally that “leaking is tantamount to aiding the enemies of the United States.”
As at Guantanamo, rules of evidence reaching back to early English common law were turned upside down. In Manning’s case, he was convicted of espionage, even though the prosecution did not have to prove either his intent to help another government or that harm was caused; a civilian court had already paved the way  for such a ruling in another whistleblower case. In addition, the government was allowed to label Manning a “traitor” and an “anarchist ” in open court, though he was on trial for neither treason  nor anarchy . His Army supervisor  in the US and Iraq was allowed to testify  against him despite having made biased and homophobic statements about him in a movie  built around portraying Manning as a sad, sexually-confused, attention-seeking young man mesmerized by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Finally, the same judge who essentially harassed the press throughout Manning’s trial issued  a 24-hour advance notice of her verdict to ensure maximum coverage only of the denouement, not the process.
Given all this, it is small comfort to know that Manning, nailed on the Espionage Act after multiple failures  in other cases by the Obama administration, was not convicted of the extreme charge of “aiding the enemy.”
Not Manning alone
Some day, Manning’s case may be seen as a bitter landmark on the road to a post-Constitutional America, but it won’t be seen as the first case in the development of the post-Constitutional system. Immediately following 9/11, top officials in the Bush administration decided to “take the gloves off .” Soon after, a wounded John Walker Lindh , the so-called American Taliban , was captured on an Afghan battlefield, held in a windowless shipping container, refused access to a lawyer even after he demanded one as an American citizen, and interrogated against his will by the FBI. Access to medical care was used as a bribe to solicit information from him. “Evidence” obtained by such means was then used to convict him in court.
Jose Padilla , a US citizen who clumsily plotted to detonate a nonexistent “dirty bomb,”  was held incommunicado for more than three years, over a year of which was in a South Carolina military jail. He was arrested only as a material witness  and was not formally charged with a crime until years later. He was given no means to challenge his detention under habeas corpus, as President Bush designated him an “enemy combatant .” Pictures  of Padilla being moved wearing sound-proof and light-proof gear strongly suggest he was subjected to the same psychosis-inducing sensory deprivation used as “white torture ” against America’s foreign enemies  in Guantanamo.
Certainly, the most egregious case of pre-Manning post-Constitutional justice was the execution of American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki  by drone in Yemen, without due process or trial, for being an al-Qaeda propagandist. In this, President Obama and his top counterterrorism advisors quite literally took on the role of judge, jury, and executioner. In a similar fashion, again in Yemen, the US killed  al-Awlaki’s American teenage son, a boy no one claimed was connected to terrorism. Obama administration lawyers went on to claim the legal right  to execute US citizens without trial or due process and have admitted to killing four Americans . Attorney General Eric Holder declared  that, “United States citizenship alone does not make such individuals immune from being targeted.”
Then-FBI Director Robert Mueller , asked in a Congressional hearing if the FBI could assassinate an American citizen in the United States, replied that he simply did not know . “I have to go back. Uh, I’m not certain whether that was addressed or not.” He added, “I’m going to defer that to others in the Department of Justice.” As if competing for an Orwellian prize, an unnamed Obama administration official told  the Washington Post, “What constitutes due process in this case is a due process in war.”
So welcome to post-Constitutional America. Its shape is, ominously enough, beginning to come into view.
Orwell’s famed dystopian novel 1984 was not intended as an instruction manual, but just days before the Manning verdict, the Obama administration essentially buried  its now-ironic-campaign promise  to protect whistleblowers, sending it down Washington’s version of the memory hole . Post-9/11, torture famously stopped being torture if an American did it, and its users were not prosecutable  by the Justice Department.
Similarly, full-spectrum spying is not considered to violate the Fourth Amendment and does not even require probable cause . Low-level  NSA analysts have desktop access to the private emails and phone calls of Americans. The Post Office photographs the envelopes of every one of the 160 billion pieces of mail it handles, collecting the metadata  of “to:” and “from:” addresses. An Obama administration Insider Threat Program  requires federal employees (including the Peace Corps ) to report on the suspicious behavior of coworkers.
Government officials concerned over possible wrongdoing in their departments or agencies who “go through proper channels” are fired  or prosecuted . Government whistleblowers are commanded to return to face justice , while law-breakers in the service of the government are allowed to flee justice . CIA officers who destroy evidence of torture  go free, while a CIA agent who blew the whistle on torture  is locked up.
Secret  laws and secret courts  can create secret  law you can’t know about for “crimes” you don’t even know exist. You can nonetheless be arrested for committing them. Thanks to the PATRIOT Act, citizens, even librarians , can be served by the FBI with a National Security Letter  (not requiring a court order) demanding records and other information, and gagging them from revealing to anyone that such information has been demanded or such a letter delivered. Citizens may be held without trial, and denied their Constitutional rights as soon as they are designated “terrorists .” Lawyers and habeas corpus are available only when the government allows.
In the last decade, 10 times  as many employers turned to FBI criminal databases to screen job applicants. The press is restricted when it comes to covering “open trials.” The war  on whistleblowers is metastasizing into a war  on the First Amendment. People may now be convicted based on secret testimony by unnamed persons. Military courts and jails can replace civilian ones. Justice can be twisted and tangled into an almost unrecognizable form and then used to send a young man to prison for decades. Claiming its actions lawful while shielding the “legal” opinions  cited, often even from Congress, the government can send its drones to assassinate its own citizens.
One by one, the tools and attitudes of the war on terror, of a world in which the “gloves” are eternally off, have come home. The comic strip character Pogo’s classic warning  – “We have met the enemy and he is us” – seems ever less like a metaphor. According to the US government, increasingly we are now indeed their enemy.
This piece is reposted from TomDispatch.com  with that site’s permission.
Other Recommended Article Selections;
- Muslim veil ban urged in French universities
- The private eyes spying for the State: Public officials are spending YOUR millions on snoopers
- On campus
- Fury as charity boss says: Donors don’t mind paying for our six-figure salaries
- Zero-hours contracts are the modern version of the dockers’ line-up
- The new Stasi: Your boss and your neighbors join the surveillance state
- U.S. directs agents to cover up use of wiretaps
- ‘1984 Day’: Restore the 4th movement sparks nationwide anti-snooping protest
- Sorry gents, the results are in: Men really ARE good for nothing (but fear not, women still need us to get rid of spiders)
- Curry eaters are risk takers: Fans of spicy foods are more likely to to enjoy adrenalin-pumping situations