//
you're reading...
Uncategorized

The Guardian Exclusive: An Historic Defeat Against Modern-Day British Police State (Lets All Follow With Our Own Legal Requests!)

Well the Guardian came out today with an amazing story of an historic defeat on the modern-day British Police State, and thus without a single grain of doubt, today’s victory for Messr. John Catt, a peaceful political activist, will undoubtedly set an unprecedented wave of counter-sues and actions against these dangerous modern police state powers and practices of upholding, i.e. without individual’s consent or awareness, peaceful activists and citizens information as ”part of criminal intelligence or domestic extremism” without actual truth.

We, here at JG/HMCO, are already preparing our own papers to send out thanks to this advisory post from the Guardian.

Our first step is to independently request for our details via Met Police (see this web-page for relevant application forms), which the police might be holding illegally (without our knowledge or consent, or actual justification based on any criminal act undertaken: none of us has ever, ever, been arrested for any crimes, or issues, or even mere contacted by police, minus the stop and search at airports usually based on racial profiling practices rather than criminal profiles). Anyway, after this first approach, we will follow this up by also seeking the services of Human Rights Solicitors Bhatt Murphy (same firm which made this historical verdict possible for Messr. John Catt), for a sort of due-diligence on our part to make sure we have been handed all the information on their databases that is illegally held up (and those they might claim to be legally uphold of course we will take a next step to challenge their conception of legality in courts on what make these legal to hold).

 

LETS TAKE DOWN THE ROTTEN POLICE STATE SYSTEM NOW– TAKE ACTION & SEND IN YOUR OWN REQUEST/OVER-RIDE THE SYSTEM!

 

The Article:

Protester wins surveillance database fight

John Catt, who has no criminal record, wins legal action to have records deleted from police database of suspected extremists

An 88-year-old campaigner has won a landmark lawsuit against police chiefs who labelled him a “domestic extremist” and logged his political activities on a secret database.

The ruling by three senior judges puts pressure on the police, already heavily criticised for running undercover operatives in political groups, to curtail their surveillance of law-abiding protesters.

The judges decided police chiefs acted unlawfully by secretly keeping a detailed record of John Catt’s presence at more than 55 protests over a four-year period.

The entries described Catt’s habit of drawing sketches of the demonstrations. Details of the surveillance, which recorded details of his appearance such as “clean-shaven” and slogans on his clothes, were revealed by the Guardian in 2010.

The pensioner, who has no criminal record, is among thousands of political campaigners recorded on the database by the same covert unit that has been embedding spies such as Mark Kennedya police officer who infiltrated environmental protest groups – in political movements for more than a decade.

On Thursday Lord Dyson, who is the Master of the Rolls, and two other appeal court judges ordered Bernard Hogan-Howe, the commissioner of the Metropolitan police, to delete Catt’s file from the database, ruling that the surveillance had significantly violated his human rights.

The judges noted that the police could not explain why it was necessary to record Catt’s political activities in minute detail.

Lawyers for the police had argued that the anti-war activist regularly attended demonstrations against a Brighton arms factory near his home, which had at times descended into disorder.

The judges dismissed arguments from Adrian Tudway, the police chief then in charge of the covert unit, that police needed to monitor Catt because he “associates closely with violent” campaigners against the factory of the EDO arms firm.

They said it was “striking” that Tudway had not said the records held on the pensioner had helped police in any way.

“Mr Tudway states, in general terms, that it is valuable to have information about Mr Catt’s attendance at protests because he associates with those who have a propensity to violence and crime, but he does not explain why that is so, given that Mr Catt has been attending similar protests for many years without it being suggested that he indulges in criminal activity or actively encourages those that do.”

The judges added that it appeared that officers had been recording “the names of any persons they can identify, regardless of the particular nature of their participation”.

Catt said: “I hope this judgment will bring an end to the abusive and intimidatory monitoring of peaceful protesters by police forces nationwide.

“Police surveillance of this kind only serves to undermine our democracy and deter lawful protest.”

A similar court of appeal ruling four years ago forced the Met to remove 40% of photographs of campaigners held on another database.

In a separate ruling, which also challenged the police’s practice of storing the public’s personal data on databases, the three judges ordered the Met to erase a warning that had been issued against an unnamed woman.

Three years ago officers had warned the woman for allegedly making a homophobic comment about a neighbour. But she argued that police had treated her unfairly as she had not been given an opportunity to respond to the allegation.

She took legal action to prevent the Met keeping a copy of the warning notice on their files for 12 years. She feared it could be disclosed to employers when they checked her criminal record.

A Met spokesperson said: “We are disappointed with today’s judgment and intend to consider it carefully before reaching a decision on whether to appeal.

“Police databases, including those containing data on domestic extremism, are maintained in compliance with the police information statutory code of practice.

“This provides a framework for the collection of information for policing purposes. The national domestic extremism unit database is maintained according to these principles.”

Advertisements

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: